When ESOs are granted, the entire value consists
of "Time Premium" because there generally is no
"Intrinsic Value" at the grant date.
This "Time Premium" is real value and not an illusion.
The "Time Premium" is what FASB (Financial Accounting
Standards Board) and the SEC require all the companies
to value at the grant date and expense against their
earnings over the vesting period.
When a grantee receives an ESO grant, he receives a value
and the Employer takes on a contracual liability to
perform in respect of the grantee. That liability perhaps has
a value equal to the benefit to the employee. Some
pundits speculate that the cost to the employer is
greater than the real and perceived benefit to the
employee/grantee.
If the stock moves up and is in-the-money then there
is now some "Intrinsic Value". But, there still is "Time
Premium". Often the "Time Premium" is greater than
the "Intrinsic Value", especially with highly volatile
stocks, even if there is substantial "Intrinsic Value".
When a grantee exercises an ESO he forfeits all of the
remaining "Time Premium" and receives only the "Intrinsic
Value" on which, he is required to pay a tax upon
exercise or sale of the stock.
Who gets the forfeited "Time Premium"? The employer
does because his liability to the employee, has been
reduced to the "Intrinsic Value" upon exercise.
Some who call themselves "Options Advisors" advocate
forfeiting "Time Premium" by premature exercises in order
to use the money to diversify (s if a diversified portfolio
is some magic bullet). They essentially advocate that
you return a large part of your compensation to the
employer and pay an early tax for the priviledge of
diversity in some mutual fund loaded with fees and
commissions, which underperforms the indexes.
It is a mystery to me why there is no litigation from
employees and executives who are recepients of this
premature exercise and diversify advice, when it costs
employees an estimated $10 billion a year.
John Olagues
olagues@gmail.com
www.optionsforemployees.com